The employment apparatus
No entity to open, no payroll to run, no benefits, no notice periods, no local employment law to learn. You contract with an EU company and receive one invoice a month. Everything behind that invoice is our problem.
You interview every candidate before anything starts. The first two weeks are free. If they are not right, you walk away and pay nothing.
No setup fees, no procurement cycle, no minimum term. A call, a shortlist, a free trial, then a decision that is entirely yours.
What you are building, the stack, the seniority, and how your team works. A technical conversation, not a sales script.
Two or three engineers matched to the role. You interview them with your own process. If none fit, we go again.
They work your tickets, in your repo, on your standups. You judge real output rather than a CV and an hour of conversation.
Continue and the first invoice starts from week five. Walk and you owe nothing. After that, 30 days notice any time.
Sometimes you should. If you have the headcount, the time, and the certainty, hire. This is for when you do not.
Time to first commit
Two to four months, if the search works
Two weeks
What it costs to be wrong
A termination process, and months lost
You walk. In the first two weeks you owe nothing
Commitment
A permanent employment contract
30 days notice, month to month
Where the budget comes from
A headcount request, and whoever approves those
Your own budget, one invoice
Employer risk
Payroll, benefits, notice periods, employment law
Ours. You have a supplier, not an employee
If they underperform
You manage it, for a long time
We replace them, at no cost
If an engineer works out and you want them on staff, that is a good outcome and we price it rather than block it. After twelve months you can bring them in-house for a conversion fee, and after twenty four months there is no fee at all. We would rather be the way you found a great engineer than the reason you lost one.
No entity to open, no payroll to run, no benefits, no notice periods, no local employment law to learn. You contract with an EU company and receive one invoice a month. Everything behind that invoice is our problem.
An Article 28 data processing agreement, Standard Contractual Clauses, and a transfer impact assessment, drafted and ready before your first call. Your DPO reviews a finished pack instead of building one. Most vendors leave this to you and it costs weeks.
Every engineer signs IP assignment and confidentiality terms before they touch your repository, and that assignment runs through to you. You own the code and everything produced for you, with an unbroken chain, not a promise.
If an engineer is not working out, we replace them at no cost and carry the handover. If they leave, that is our problem to solve, not a hole in your roadmap. You never absorb the cost of a bad match.
I have been an engineer, a freelancer, and a head of product for European tech companies. I have spent the last six years hiring developers, reviewing their work, and shipping releases. I know what a good engineer looks like in an interview and what they look like in month four, and those are not the same skill.
So I do the first interview myself, on every single candidate, before you ever meet them. You are not buying access to a database of CVs. You are buying my judgement about who is worth your time, and then you check that judgement yourself with your own interview and two free weeks.
If I send you someone who is not good enough, you find out in two weeks and it costs you nothing.
Something else? Tell us the role and we will source against it.
Tell us the role. You get a shortlist in three days, you interview them yourself, and the first two weeks cost you nothing.